| |
Download a PDF of the article.
You will need Adobe Acrobat Reader to view
this article. Click
here to download this free
program.
|
|
Destination Springfield
By John Zukowsky
Director, Westcott House Foundation
Authors
such as Edward McMahon have written convincingly about how historic
architectural environments can add to the economic
welfare of a community, but the same can also be said for examples
of good-quality contemporary architecture. Witness the recent success
that cities such as Milwaukee and Chicago have had with hiring
superstar architects to design their art museum and open-air concert
bandstand, respectively, in order to boost cultural tourism in
those cities. Indeed, citizens in smaller midwestern cities from
Davenport, Iowa to Grand Rapids, Michigan and Akron, Ohio have
all jumped on the bandwagon and hired well-known European architects
to design new museums or make very contemporary additions to their
existing art museums. A new construction such as the Museum of
Contemporary Art in Cincinnati by Iraqi-born and London-based architect
Zaha Hadid -- the first woman to win the prestigious Pritzker Architecture
Prize -- has made headlines in the architectural and popular press
alike in the past year. In many ways, all of this very recent activity
is the result of the international media and tourism blockbuster
of Frank Gehry’s expressionistic, titanium Guggenheim Museum
in Bilbao, Spain when it opened 1999-2000 to record-breaking crowds.
But most people do not realize that his famed museum was part of
a much larger ongoing plan that the city of Bilbao and regional
government of Biskaia have implemented, to hire renowned contemporary
architects from across Europe, the United States and Japan, to
design projects there. This is being done in a very conscious effort
to change the image of Bilbao from a rust belt, former shipbuilding
city to an international destination for architectural tourism.
What Bilbao started in the 1990s was part of a much longer continuum
where European cities and their respective governments consciously
invested in prominent and often coordinated, carefully planned
new construction in order to create tourist destinations as well
as solve various architectural and urban problems. Of all European
countries it seems that Germany has been the most consistent supporter
of this belief throughout the twentieth century, and there are
numerous examples that can support this observation. Historically
the most famous of these is the Weissenhof Siedlung in Stuttgart
from 1927 which showcased what ideal modern housing could be in
a series of model homes and apartments by architects from around
Europe who soon became leading practitioners of the Modern Movement
in the late 1920s and early 30s. But one of the prominent, fairly
recent examples includes the dozens of new museums and exhibition
halls created in the 1980s by the city of Frankfurt to establish
that their city was both a leader in culture as well as in banking.
Another includes the International Bau-Austellung (IBA) or International
Building Exhibition of the mid 1980s in what was then West Berlin.
This was the public-private partnership that developed subsidized
housing in an effort to revitalize various older residential, commercial
and even disused industrial areas, and promote the pluralistic,
democratic values of Western democracy on the frontier of the Cold
War. Perhaps the most notable example of the latter IBA developments
was the 1985-88 re-planning of the industrial harbor at Tegel (Tegelerhafen)
as a residential area with villa-like apartment buildings designed
by prominent architects such as Americans John Hejduk, Charles
Moore, Robert A.M. Stern, and Stanley Tigerman, as well as Frenchman
Antoine Grumbach and Italian Paolo Portoghesi, along with a number
of Berlin builders. This same type of international housing exhibition
was also done previously in postwar West Berlin’s Interbau
exhibition of 1957, which has precedents in 1920s examples throughout
the city as well.
In contrast to those examples, many might correctly cite the importance
of the Cummins Engine Foundation in their support of the work of
prominent American architects for public buildings in Columbus,
Indiana. Their efforts over the past four decades and more have
made that small city a little capital of American architecture
from the second half of the twentieth century, and undeniably an
important architectural destination in the Midwest. But in those
disparate examples that are seemingly scattered throughout that
town, the architectural sites and their impact are also dissipated
all over the townscape. What makes the German, and particularly,
the IBA examples more powerful is that each of the various buildings
is part of a greater whole, with those greater developments becoming
an anchor for subsequent neighborhood growth along with being very
strong ensembles of architecture in themselves – spatial
experiences that are truly coordinated destinations related to
the needs of contemporary society. Beyond Frank Lloyd Wright’s
great Westcott House, Springfield already has striking examples
of historic buildings around town, like the Heritage Center, the
Post Office, and its old public library. It has some good newer
buildings in the Kuss Auditorium, the main public library, and
within the city hall plaza. And it has some great sequential building
potential within, say, preservation of the grand old houses on
Limestone and High Streets. But what it could use that even the
architectural mecca of Columbus Indiana doesn’t have is a
coordinated sequence of contemporary buildings – a sequence
that might truly be an architectural destination in itself, as
well as serve institutional needs within and without the community.
Who knows, we at the Westcott House Foundation might be part of
making this happen here. In early September 2004 we had the opportunity
of having architect Stanley Tigerman visit our property and talk
with us about what we might be able to do in helping our historic
house come alive for architectural enthusiasts and the general
public across the entire region. I am hopeful that his first visit
will be the beginning of a regional dialogue that will eventually
bring some of those more positive contemporary urban experiences
from cities like Berlin into our own built environment, making
Springfield an architectural destination for the twenty-first century. |
|